While admiring the writer's research on his recent letter regarding Intelligent Design vs. Darwinism, I would like to remind him the same scientific criteria must be applied to Intelligent Design that is applied to Darwinism. Simply shooting holes in one theory does not prove that another theory is the correct one. Also, do not forget the DNA evidence.

Just as Newton's and Einstein's theories have been challenged and modified or superseded, I am sure the same things will happen to Darwinism, but just because something looks like design and acts like design doesn't prove that it is design. A preponderance of evidence must be found before a theory can be accepted in the scientific community.